All posts by St++rt

Kaitiaki Huawaere Ako | Open Education Librarian role re-advertised

Kia ora koutou,

We’ve re-advertised the Kaitiaki Huawaere Ako | Open Education Librarian role – you can find it on the UC Jobs page here.

I’d be really interested to talk to any Library staff who are interested in this role, even if you feel you don’t have the qualifications or experience that the PD is asking for. Please do feel free to contact me if you have any questions about this, or just want to chat.

Also, please pass this link on to anyone in your networks who may be interested in this role.

Ngā mihi,

Stuart

Inside Out #19

I’ve been reading back through previous Inside Outs, and other posts on Counterculture, and, as always, I’m amazed by the amount and the range of splendid things we all get up to. I’m privileged as a manager to get a regular overview of activity across the library; otherwise my view is of research support and Subject Librarian responsibilities.

It always astounds me how broad our remit is. The library is unique in this – we work across student support, student welfare, student learning, academic support, teaching and learning support, information resources management, information resources creation and curation, collection management, archiving, art curation, Māori and Pacific peoples support, departmental and academic liaison, research support, and, I’m sure, many other things I’ve forgotten. We’re active at Academic Board, Research Committee, Learning & Teaching Committee, Postgraduate Research Committee, Faculty meetings, and of course, Library Committee.

We do all this by building relationships with people inside and outside the library, by taking workshops and demos, by teaching, by meeting with people one on one, by answering AskLive questions, desk enquiries, and emails, by attending meetings, by talking to people over coffee, through phone calls, through exhibitions, by reading, thinking and writing, by updating databases, by influencing, through social media and traditional media, by marketing ourselves, by moving desks and shelves, by ensuring we’re equipped digitally, through reports, by being creative and analytic and thorough and repetitive and persistent and determined. And by living out our values, whether we know them or not.

We have expert and qualified staff working across all of these areas, to a high level of achievement. The library management team frequently focus on how staff welfare can be improved, how to provide professional development, and how to make work fulfilling. We’re interested in our staff not just as ‘human resources’ but as real people who have lives outside of work.

The other thing that occurs to me is that we’ve become pretty good at achieving a lot in adverse conditions. My observation is that staff do all they can to provide a level of service that constantly exceeds expectations, even when they’re not being pushed to do so. This shows kotahitanga and manaakitanga, and coupled with the grace and humour that most apply to their work life, makes me grateful to be working with a whole bunch of decent people.

We still face important challenges. We are at the start of a long journey to understand how being a Te Tiriti-led library really works, and we’ve been slow to get on to this. We don’t always know the best way to engage with change, or how to accept it. We’re a diverse bunch in terms of all of the things we do, and that can cause tension.

But, again, reading about what we’ve done, we’re a highly significant part of this university – crucial to many areas, and influential in others.

LTR finished some things

You might remember that periodically I post in Counterculture the completed tasks from the LTR visualisation board, so you can see that we do actually get stuff done… I haven’t done this for a long time and the completed tasks have been building up, so apologies for this being a super-long post. In fact, the previous report was on 1 October 2021. This isn’t everything we’ve done, just the projects and one-off (even if they repeat each year) activities.

If you’d like further details about any of these let me know and I can put you on to the person or team who did the work.

  1. SciVal metrics report: Ian Wright requested a report that looked at how UC has been performing against the other New Zealand universities, within each of the All Science Journal Classification codes, and between each Faculty/Department. This data was gathered from SciVal and many, many graphs were made.
  2. THE impact rankings – policies: As part of the THE impact rankings, we look at how UC is performing against each UN Sustainable Development Goal, and we get points based on a number of categories. One of these categories is whether we have policies on a range of topics (e.g. equal pay, discrimination, food waste etc.). Created a document that matched the SDG requirement with the related UC policy.
  3. SciVal rollout: Marketed SciVal as new research metrics tool available at UC, created a subject guide to answer some of the more common SciVal questions, facilitated training sessions, met with academics, created the UC structure within SciVal, and generally made sure it was working, and the people who wanted to use SciVal, could.
  4. Research Centre review: Created groups within SciVal for each UC Research Centre, and pulled out key research performance metrics to add to a larger report that R&I were creating.
  5. SDG data gathering: Downloading rankings data from Times Higher Education so that we could benchmark UC against other institutions to find areas where we could improve our own scores.
  6. Provide research and literature for Ngā Hau e Whā o Tāwhirimātea: Culturally Responsive Teaching and Learning for the Tertiary Sector publication, as well as co-authoring a chapter and part of editing team for the overall publication.
  7. Induction for new students – Creation of a LEARN page with 10 useful things for new students to know about the Library.
  8. Review EndNote at UC. Comprehensive review of Bibliographic services including EndNote. Recommendation to keep EndNote, but to also expand into Zotero.
  9. ENGR101- Helping new Engineering students to succeed in an early assignment. The size of the cohort makes this a significant task.
  10. Online Module Creation- Creating bite-sized learning modules and videos that can be incorporated into any Learn page.
  11. Catapult Courses Project- Identifying where library support can help with successful outcomes in key early courses, and developing content to support students to achieve.
  12. PSYC105 – Working with Fleur Pawsey (course coordinator), Donna Thompson (Learning Design and Technology Team) and Jessica from Te Rua Makerspace, a library lab was developed which students could complete in-person or online. It was a big undertaking – over 1000 students and 30 lab groups.
  13. APA guide: improve navigation with accordions. Longer pages are now divided into digestible sections for easy reading and linking.
  14. There is now an embedded legal research component in CRJU202. A similar component is taught in LAWS205 which now means that LLB and BCJ both encounter the same legal research skill instruction within their degree. This should have flow-on effects for the legal research skills of all students. We are the only law school in NZ teaching legal research skills in this way.

Omicron will peak relatively soon

Kia ora koutou,

Omicron will end, and it will peak relatively soon. That’s good news!

“…experts now expect New Zealand’s Omicron peak to occur within a fortnight.

And the peak in hospitalisations is expected to occur another two weeks after that, says the Ministry of Health, meaning the country could be on a downward slide as soon as the end of the month.” (from https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/covid-19-omicron-outbreak-todays-case-numbers-aucklands-health-system-faces-growing-pressure/GAVQGQ2WCFYCKJ6DFBYKNGOQHY/)

This graph (see https://chrisbillington.net/COVID_NZ.html, third graph down as at 1.00 4 Mar 2022) displays a modelled timeline and shows a peak in mid March.

Ngā mihi,

Library staff welfare response team

Inside Out #12

I’m at a bit of a loss finding anything helpful to say so early in the year, so this’ll be brief.

I had a nice break, thanks for asking. Some highlights:

  • Saw a guy in the supermarket with a T-shirt that said “Same shit, different Dave”. I thought it would be awesome to buy that shirt for both Dave’s in LTR…
  • Discovered Wordle, and play it every day. It’s great that you can only play once a day, so you can be addicted, but you can’t waste all day on it. And there’s a te reo version as well, called Panga
  • Was given four jigsaw puzzles and have completed two in the traditional way (as opposed to the horse jigsaw picture…)

Mulling over work things since I returned last week one or two thoughts stand out:

  • Understanding our identity as a Treaty-led nation, organisation, and library is at the heart of what we want to achieve and how we want to achieve it this year. This won’t happen overnight, but we should aim high, as the whakatauki says: Whāia te iti kahurangi ki te tūohu koe me he maunga teitei (Seek the treasure you value most dearly: if you bow your head, let it be to a lofty mountain).
  • This will be another COVID year, but we don’t know what form the impact will take yet, or what initiatives UC will take
  • There will be changes in leadership in the Library with Aurelia arriving and Anne leaving, but our work will continue to align itself with the UC strategy
  • Our DVC-Research partner units are both in the middle of change. The Postgraduate Research Office is implementing a Graduate College, and Research & Innovation are implementing changes to their structure.
  • Our 2022 Operational Plan looks similar to last year’s, and that shows stability of strategy and an assessment that we were going in the right direction last year.
  • The Chelsea buns at Café 101 are very very good.

From Eng to Ed…

Kiera when she was supporting Engineering

Starting this week Kiera has taken over Fiona’s discipline support for the Faculty of Education. She has surrendered her engineering subject support but will continue with her functional work.

We are currently writing a business case to recruit for a new Kaitiaki Kaupapa | Subject Librarian who will focus on engineering support and leading the promotion and adoption of open educational resources. Please contact Dave L or Brian for all engineering enquiries in the meantime.

Kiera has now relocated to Level 5 of Central Library – pop in and say hello!

Kiera now that she is supporting Education

 

LTR has done some things

This is the second in our periodic reporting on the tasks the LTR team have completed since the previous report (on 18 June 2021).

This comes from our visual management board, so it doesn’t include everything we’ve done, just the project-type activities.

  • Scopus Affiliations: Looking at all the authors from 2015-2021 who are affiliated to UC in Scopus, but are not in Elements and figuring out who they are/what department they work with.
  • Academics attitudes to textbooks research: Fiona, Lisa and Sara, along with Cheryl Brown (UC) and Richard White (Otago), surveyed academics nationally to establish how they view textbook use, how they choose their textbooks and their attitude to open textbooks. Fiona produced a report on the survey findings and we will be presenting the results at the LIANZA conference in November.
  • Visualise Your Thesis: This year’s competition asked our postgraduate students to create a one-minute video that explains their research to a general audience. We had 13 entries, representing all of the colleges.
  • Literature for Edu Mātauranga Māori endorsement: This involved the provision of a compilation of literature to tautoko the development of the new Batchelor of Teaching and Learning with an endorsement in Mātauranga Māori. The focus was on Māori and Indigenous pedagogies/ways of teaching & learning, with the idea that the research could help inform how the endorsement might be taught by lecturers, as well as content for the students of the course.
  • Video introductions: Filming Introductions for MB subject specialists
  • Omeka S for teaching and research support: The creation of an Omeka S homepage for UC. Guidelines and policy for users detailed on this page. Other library teams collaborating.
  • SCIE 101 support: Creating a new online searching module that includes finding Māori, Pacific and Indigenous material. Also, library tip videos, Librarian introductions videos. Tutorial activity review. Caroline Syddall and Jemma Wiki also contributing.

Inside Out 3

According to library managers, the remit for these Inside Out blogposts is to “write whatever you want about anything to do with whatever you want”. Kind of restrictive, huh? Typical managers. So, within these draconian confines I have, with much mental manipulation, managed to find a few topics where, loosely and with many mistakes, I can colour between the lines…

“Science”
I’ve initiated a “scientific” experiment on Level 5 in the LTR area: each week we consume two cakes of chocolate: a Cadbury’s and a Whitakers’ of the same flavour. So far we’ve compared five flavours (hazelnut, fruit & nut, black forest, coconut, and milk chocolate), and there are a few more milk chocolate flavours to go before we switch to dark chocolate. At the end I will create a chart that summarizes the findings.

Joint Library | R&I | ITS meetings
The description of this monthly meeting is deceptive and makes it sound bigger than it is. It’s really a research support meeting, not including people involved in research funding. So it’s LTR, Helen, four staff from R&I, and John Edwards and Francois Bissey from ITS. But it’s an excellent forum for sharing what’s been happening in the research support area in the previous month, and what’s coming up. Everyone contributes and discusses. Topics in the last few months have included:

  • Software like REDCap, Jupyterhub, ImpactStory
  • Research analytics systems like SciVal and Dimensions
  • University rankings like THE, Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs), and QS
  • The Researcher Advisory Group
  • Events like the Ōtautahi Editors’ Symposium
  • The UC Research Repository, and Elements
  • Open Access, transformative agreements, and the OA Fund
  • The Research Compute Cluster (RCC), and RCC v2
  • Computer storage for research data
  • The PBRF, where should researchers publish, and Scopus-indexed journals

Other joint Library and R&I things
We also collaborate with R&I on other things. Each month we provide a joint research support report to the UC Research Committee, we take joint workshops on publishing and impact, and we undertake joint projects, such as the Research Lifecycle and research data management. Also, we collaborate a lot, and increasingly, on bibliometrics and publications data. Kiera works closely with Pip Hawkes from R&I on various data reports, including university ranking stats. Now that we have SciVal we are working together on creating a reporting framework for it.

Every fortnight I meet with Rebecca Hurrell, R&I’s Research Delivery Lead, to talk about issues common to both our teams. We also gossip quite a lot.

Postgraduate stuff
We’re involved with the Postgraduate Research Office as well in that we’ve helped them think through the Doctoral Development programme (which is a rebundling of the research workshops we already do), and with 3MT (3 minute thesis) and the Doctoral Publishing Prize.

It is handy being on the UC Postgraduate Committee because it keeps me up to date with new initiatives with postgraduates and puts me in touch with the student representatives. And that has led to a regular meeting between LTR and the reps from PGSA, UCSA and Te Akatoki, and the Shut Up & Write sessions that we host for the PGSA.

PM
I’ll mention one more thing. It’s internal to the Library, it’s procedural, it’s not exciting, but it’s really helped how we do our work. Project Management. You’ll be aware that we changed the way we do projects about 2 years ago. The library used to have 4,367 ‘current’ projects, all using differing methodology, with none of them ever ending. Now we have about 7, with clear purposes and schedules and constant monitoring. The Project Board (made up of the UL and the two AULs) meet bimonthly to monitor progress on all active projects. The Project Action Team (PAT) (Gabrielle, Brian, Kim and me) look after the project framework, folders and templates, and are available to assist anyone with their project.

And that, as they say, is a wrap. Perhaps a quick joke for the road: My friend said to me “Do you like wearing that Hi-Viz jacket all the time?” I said “I wouldn’t be seen without it.”