A collaboration between Dr Paul Docherty (School of Mechanical Engineering), Dr Wendy Fox-Turnbull (School of Teacher Education) and Pinelopi Zaka (e-Learning Support) provided research driven validation of flipped teaching strategy in foundational engineering. The flipped approach proved to be a successful pedagogical mechanism for this unique cohort of students and was well-received. The research was also successful and has yielded three conference submissions and three journal papers have been submitted. Details of the research outcomes can be seen on the Ako Aotearoa website https://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/projects/flipped-classroom-foundation-engineering.
Dr Rhonda Powell from the School of Law shares how technology was used in her course to encourage student engagement and authentic learning.
In this video Dr. Rachel Martin from the College of Education, Health and Human Development describes students’ use of multimedia collaboration tools as part of their learning.
In this presentation Fiona Dalzell, tutor in environmental ethics, talks about the use of learner created videos for assessment.
Professor Tanja Mitrovic, Computer Science and Engineering, presents her research about video based learning.
In this video Dr. Vera Leier, Lecturer in Language, Social and Political Sciences, describes her use of Instagram in a German
By Dr. Keith Dixon, Accounting and Information Systems
I very much tend to overuse LEARN. That is, compared with what the majority of students want or expect, and with what they are used to on other courses. I’ve asked my students about this and find their expectations and their preferences vary so much that I doubt there’s a way to satisfy all the people all the time. But that’s no different from some students preferring lectures they can attend and others just wanting video recordings of the lectures with the PowerPoints and the notes, and others preferring tutorials, interactive classes, group assignments or fieldwork. And some students being anxious to know the exam questions, so that they can reproduce the answers the examiner regards as correct, and others wanting challenging assessments, to engage them or differentiate them from the pack. Seen alongside all this, LEARN does anything from adding to the comprehensiveness of the learning structure and process of a course in a programme with which a student is enthusiastically engaged, to being a recently added element that increases the complexity and work burden associated with the student’s weekly life, which of course is conducted not only on campus but also outside campus, increasingly in paid employment in order to make ends meet.
Distance delivery experience
By way of personal background, I should explain that some of my career has been spent at universities whose mode of learning delivery included “distance”, and indeed in one case was entirely “distance”, unless one counted the really exciting days and nights of “the residential school”. The significance of this experience was that I learnt about designing and writing courses for students. There were two parts to this design and writing that particularly stand out: each student was to learn separately from other students by following a programme of activities, assessed and otherwise; and the programme, including the activities, assessments, content and course narrative were all written, which mostly happened before the course started—even the communications during the course, to maintain a dialogue with the student, were mostly planned and composed beforehand and released by the system as the course proceeded.
Too many messages?
So, how do I overuse LEARN? First, I send out too many messages to “participants” using the News Forum. Every LEARN site has one and, as well as being readable on the LEARN site, the messages are supposed to reach email inboxes the students are allegedly accessing hourly or daily. The messages start with a Welcome message, sent somewhere between the students names being added to the site eight or nine days before the first “lecture” and when I can see that most of the students’ names on the SMS course list are present on the site—it’s annoying that the students with PRE status don’t seem to have LEARN access, sometimes until after the first “lecture”, unless I take the trouble to manually enrol them onto the site. This first message is aimed at pointing the students towards the LEARN site and items there and elsewhere that I think should help them “plan their studies”. Frustratingly, this message doesn’t always provoke action, as evidenced by the number of participants who show as “Never” having visited the LEARN site by the time of the first “lecture”.
I also send messages out before classes, forewarning students of the agenda for the class and what activity (e.g., work through a case study or document, go on a field trip, go surfing) to do beforehand to prepare for the session content and activities. I also send messages out after classes, putting the class in context, tying up loose ends, etc.; often a message of this sort doubles up as the message forewarning the next class. These messages vary in impact from students who regularly do the preparation, to students who seem nonplussed about the materials and activities I refer to when arriving at a class; what’s worse is that the students who do prepare are easily discouraged by those who don’t, and so stop, or pretend to stop, preparing or choose to stay away from classes and work at home alone away from the other students.
Programme of study format
Second, I write the LEARN site as a programme of study. This includes using sections for each topic or theme, or as separate resource areas; these are in addition to sections for Orientation, Learning and Study Skills, and Assessment. This can confuse students who might be more used to LEARN sites limited to separate sections for Lectures, Tutorials and Administration, with perhaps sections containing the Reading List, and Past Test and Exam Papers. The programme of study format occasionally annoys students merely wanting the PowerPoint slides for the next lecture, or the task or questions for the next tutorial. I have reduced this annoyance by using images with “Slides”, “Tutorial” and “Lectorial” placed next to the relevant items on the programme pages.
Using a variety of media
In the programme narratives, I include a lot of images to brighten up and convey something about the materials, and I usually attach some text to each item, including the abstract of articles, the synopsis of case studies, some comments about the YouTube or other videos—putting the video URL as an Internet link in or near the comments means the video is embedded and shows as a picture, which plays when clicked—and some comments about how to use the quantitative questions and answers—doing exercises, problems, etc. is essential to learning to keep books, perform calculations, etc. However, when it’s all present, I get what amount to complaints about this looking like too much material to be studied and too much work. This is notwithstanding that some students want this, others want that and still others want something else; by satisfying many of these disparate needs, it can look like there’s too much, particularly so for a student who has “Never” accessed the LEARN site before and isn’t up with the course story.
Assessment and Gradebook
Third, I use the assessment and related functions on LEARN to distribute tasks, organise groups (using the group and groupings functions), collect assignments, mark them and provide feedback (or “return them”), and notify marks and show accumulating marks (through the Gradebook function). I also administer electronic, time-limited end-of-course assessments (akin to an exam) using the assessment function. And if an exam or test is of the traditional format, I still notify the question and paper marks through the LEARN Gradebook function, so again allowing students to see, all the way through to the end, the accumulating marks for the course I have recorded for them—our student advisors can access the LEARN site and see these too. The only thing I find LEARN can’t handle are large files resulting from students submitting assessments on video (e.g., an oral reflection, a presentation) but this is easily overcome by using clouds, YouTube, etc. Students are generally happy and comfortable with this use of LEARN as an assessment process tool.
Fourth, I use forums, especially to deal with queries about traditional tests and exams. On some of the courses, students are encouraged to complete past papers. They will come up with matters on which they are unsure, stuck or perplexed, as well as ask about what’s going to be on a paper whose access is secret until the start of the test or exam. I find students are reluctant to direct their questions through these forums, and so I cut and paste the personal emails I receive into the forum, without giving the name of the student, thus “A student writes: blah, blah, blah”. Sometimes I’ll respond straightaway, or I’ll answer with a question and invite other students to write. Even then, most students are reluctant to do so, and so at some point I’ll go back and respond some more, if needed.
Fifth, I use “Participants” to check on whether students are accessing LEARN regularly—I send out a couple of messages each course to the “Nevers” and the ones who stop accessing over the lecture breaks. I’m aware that these breaks are frequently referred to as “holidays”, despite the assignments many courses set to be handed in on the first day or so when lectures resume and the tests many other courses require to be sat then as well—I try not to set assignments or assessments to coincide with these, whether administered on LEARN or otherwise. LEARN seems to be useful for students whose perceive their last week of term or first week of the next term is too full of assessments that they can’t attend classes. I also use LearnTrak to see how few materials most students are accessing, or how many materials most students are ignoring, and the opposites. I despair at how many surface learners we seem to have, judged by those whose only interest is in the PowerPoint slides from the “lectures”, but can be amazed at the ideas, etc. students can come up with, particularly to get them through the assessments. Perhaps too many of the required assessment answers are too predictable for the students, or are just common sense or common knowledge!
Keeping up to date
Sixth, I battle to keep the LEARN sites I use up to date, accurate and in order. One thing that I’m conscious of is just how easy it can be for a LEARN site to get too far “ahead” of a new cohort of students, particularly if you start from what the LEARN site has come to look like by the end of the previous presentation or occurrence. In revising a LEARN site, I find the “Show all” view and “Find” function are handy for checking dates, especially if using the same LEARN site for a course running in both semesters.
Too much information?
Turning now to the questions of why I overuse LEARN, and what should I do about it, part of the problem is me being too enthusiastic at times and not giving the students enough consideration. It’s just too easy to find and share four or five relevant links/items, when one or two will do. It’s just too easy to send out all points bulletin messages about the learning journey ahead, without considering what happens if the messages don’t get through, or get through but are ignored, etc. If most students want to hear everything in lectures, including signals, etc. to do with what to study and how to study it, then the written messages and materials make the course look disorganised to them and hinder rather than help course communication—I’m alluding here to the point above about students being nonplussed about the materials and activities I refer to in a class on the understanding that the LEARN messages got through and were read, if not actioned.
First encounters set the norm
Part of the problem is what students are used to on other LEARN sites, especially whichever ones they first encounter at the start of Year 1, Semester 1—first courses shape expectations in many other ways. Other LEARN sites that set the norm are those associated with courses that are very much face-to-face, on which LEARN is just an easier, quicker and less costly way of distributing lecture and tutorial materials than dictating them, or duplicating, photocopying or printing them and physically handing them out. Besides, like their teachers, students are having to learn to use LEARN sites, and the more experience the teachers have of the sites, so the gap can widen between what the teacher provides and what the student can cope with.
Learn just for distance learning?
Part of the problem is institutional. LEARN has gradually expanded in use and usage to what it is today. This has occurred in a tacit way at least as much as a systematic way. As with the rest of teaching, LEARN competes with publishing research for the time of the teachers cum researchers who run most courses and design, maintain and use most LEARN sites. Within teaching, LEARN is probably more about learning by students outside classes, at a distance even, than about teaching by teachers through taught courses in which the lecture method predominates. Mention of distance learning, blended learning, student-centred learning and the virtual learning environment in the same breathe as LEARN doesn’t enamour LEARN to quite a lot of academics.
In conclusion, perhaps LEARN is not worth the time or the hassle, not the way I’ve used its many facets for recent school-leaver and inexperienced international students. I based my methods of using LEARN on my distance teaching, which was mainly with mature adult students, whose experience often extended to office work spaces and life generally. These students were far more likely to be studying out of choice, albeit often to improve their lives and work circumstances, whereas most of our students are with us as if university degree study is now compulsory. The aforementioned mature, work-experienced students were also far more likely to be good at time management and application, whereas many of our students seem to be muddling through timewise and fitting “full-time” study into week in which they are also working for pay for 20–40 hours, the job being about having money to live on and meet study costs over and above what’s covered by a student loan or allowance, private loan, scholarship, parental contribution or whatever. Perhaps I should move closer to lecture method courses and cut down the LEARN content; I should arrange what LEARN materials I do post under Lectures, Tutorials and Administration; and I should limit assessment to traditional tests and exams, and revert to the once common practice of posting assessment results on the notice board in the corridor.
In this video Professor Tim Bell describes the practice of questioning students during lectures using the University of Canterbury developed polling application UCanAsk.
Carrying on from an earlier entry in this blog, in the video below Professor Jack Heinemann talks about the reasons why we need to look beyond the traditional lecture format.